What This Site Is
Key facts
Publishing the full research pipeline, including its data gaps and automation, produces more trustworthy market research than polished conclusions with hidden methods.
- Two-stage pipeline, momentum discovery then a six-check fundamentals quality gate (as of 2026-07-10)
- Coverage, US and Indonesian equities during exchange sessions (as of 2026-07-10)
- Fundamentals history, capped at about five quarters by public APIs (as of 2026-07-10)
Data as of
Most market commentary shows you a conclusion and hides the machine that produced it. This site does the opposite: the machine is the product, and the conclusions come with their uncertainty attached.
The pipeline, in one paragraph
During US and Indonesian exchange sessions, an automated screener watches for momentum breakouts — price clearing a prior level on elevated volume. Each candidate then faces a six-check fundamentals quality gate built on recent quarterly data: revenue growth and its trend, margins and their trend, and earnings surprises. What survives is published daily as a verdict — BUY when the gate passes, WATCH when the data was insufficient to judge. The complete mechanics live on the methodology page.
Why publish the gaps
A quality gate that cannot compute a year-over-year comparison says so. A bank with no gross-margin concept gets a WATCH, not an invented number. Public data APIs cap quarterly history at about five quarters (as of ), so some checks only strengthen as history accumulates — and the site says that too. The alternative — filling gaps with plausible numbers — produces content that looks right and cannot withstand scrutiny.
What to expect here
- Daily verdicts during market sessions, in the verdicts section — each one
dated, scored, and traceable to its method.
- Long-form outlook articles in the outlook section — slower, deeper pieces on
companies and industries, written with LLM assistance and disclosed as such.
- No position sizing, ever. How much to invest depends on circumstances this site cannot
know; sizing is never published. Verdicts are research flags, not instructions.
If that trade — transparency over polish — sounds useful, the Atom feed carries every article in full.